The Business
Models & Strategy blog is an online resource center for entrepreneurs,
small business owners, business and marketing professionals. Our goal is to
provide relevant information, educate and engage with all the professional that
are interested in business and strategy.
Models to Analyze your Product Portfolio 2
Following
my previous blog about Boston Matrix, today I will provide basic guidelines to
analyze your product portfolio by employing the Directional Policy Matrix
(DPM). Compare to Boston Matrix, DPM allows for a number of factors such as
market attractiveness & relative strength.
This matrix measures the health of the market and your strength to pursue it. The results indicate the direction for future investment. The recommendation may be to invest, grow, harvest or divest
This matrix measures the health of the market and your strength to pursue it. The results indicate the direction for future investment. The recommendation may be to invest, grow, harvest or divest
Brief description of the model dimensions:
· Invest in growth: high
market attractiveness which relate to high business strengths. This position is
ideal and you should invest your best business resources here.
· Invest in capabilities: high
market attractiveness but low relative business strengths. The market potential
is attractive but you do not have the business strengths necessary for being
really successful. The options facing you are either to take what you can while
it is still possible or to invest in building a better competitive position.
You must be selective in your efforts here, as this segment will cost you to
invest in every aspect of the business.
· Manage for Cash: Low
Market Attractiveness but High Business Strengths. In this quadrant you have
high strengths in a market that has lost its attractiveness in terms of future
potential. It is still good for near term profits, so maintain the position for
as long as possible.
· Divest: Low
Market Attractiveness but Low Business Strengths. Think carefully about what
you are doing to be in this quadrant. The market is not particularly attractive
and your business strengths are below average here. Keep in this segment only
if it supports a more profitable part of your business (for instance, if this
segment completes a product line range) or if it absorbs some of the overhead
costs of a more profitable segment.
Take into consideration the following examples
of Attractiveness Factors to your business when analyzing your product
portfolio:
· Volume of sales
· value of sales
· profitability of sales
· future growth potential
· stage in Product Life Cycle
· Portfolio fit (does it fit with others)
· Is it valued to customers?
· Any competitive advantage?
· degree of competition (high, low)
· is any investment required?
· any specific customer demands?
I also provide some examples of Relative
factors, that is, how customers perceive the products?
· Brand name and awareness
· innovation
· price
· costs in using the product
· service levels
· quality
· value in use
· long term sustainability
To measure the Attractiveness Factors use the
following template. Here are the instructions:
1. Enter your products across the top of the grid
2. We advice until and 6 factors to focus the analysis
3. Enter a SCORE from 1 to 10 for each product against each
attractiveness factror. The HIGHER the score, the better the FIT of the
product
4.Calculate the average score. This will be used to place
the product on the DPM Matrix, higher or lower than the average
Now, do the same to calculate the Relevant
Strength. Instructions:
1.For EACH PRODUCT fill in a form
2.For each product identify 6 relative strength factors that
represent the customer's criteria for choosing a product (determine success
against competition)
3.Enter a SCORE from 1 to 10 for each company against each factor.
4.REMEMBER!! The score reflects the market perception and not
yours
No comments:
Post a Comment